<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="Design and SEO by Moore Legal Technology " -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="/plugins/system/jce/css/content.css?f27d3d3bdd06ddd2cda2bbb94ed45288" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xml:lang="en-gb">
	<title type="text">News | No Win No Fee Employment Solicitors | Anderton Law</title>
	<subtitle type="text"></subtitle>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk"/>
	<id>https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law</id>
	<updated>2024-03-05T17:57:12+00:00</updated>
	<author>
		<name>Anderton Law</name>
	</author>
	<generator>Design and SEO by Moore Legal Technology </generator>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law?format=feed&amp;type=atom"/>
	<entry>
		<title>EAT clarifies rules on anonymous witnesses in disciplinary proceedings</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/eat-clarifies-rules-on-anonymous-witnesses-in-disciplinary-proceedings"/>
		<published>2020-09-11T08:47:04+01:00</published>
		<updated>2020-09-11T08:47:04+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/eat-clarifies-rules-on-anonymous-witnesses-in-disciplinary-proceedings</id>
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The EAT (Mrs Justice Eady) has clarified the rules about when employers will be allowed to rely on anonymous witnesses when dismissing, in &lt;strong&gt;Tai Tarian Limited v Howell Wyn&lt;/strong&gt; Christie UKEAT/0059/19/VP.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The EAT (Mrs Justice Eady) has clarified the rules about when employers will be allowed to rely on anonymous witnesses when dismissing, in &lt;strong&gt;Tai Tarian Limited v Howell Wyn&lt;/strong&gt; Christie UKEAT/0059/19/VP.&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		<category term="Employment Law" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>EAT finds dismissal with no procedure to be fair</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/eat-finds-dismissal-with-no-procedure-to-be-fair"/>
		<published>2020-09-11T08:47:04+01:00</published>
		<updated>2020-09-11T08:47:04+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/eat-finds-dismissal-with-no-procedure-to-be-fair</id>
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The EAT (Mr Justice Choudhary) has held in &lt;strong&gt;Gallacher v Abellio Scotrail Limited&lt;/strong&gt; UKEATS/0027/19/SS, that a dismissal was fair despite the Respondent not following any proper process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The EAT (Mr Justice Choudhary) has held in &lt;strong&gt;Gallacher v Abellio Scotrail Limited&lt;/strong&gt; UKEATS/0027/19/SS, that a dismissal was fair despite the Respondent not following any proper process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		<category term="Employment Law" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Coronavirus commonly asked questions </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/coronavirus-commonly-asked-questions"/>
		<published>2020-08-01T08:47:04+01:00</published>
		<updated>2020-08-01T08:47:04+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/coronavirus-commonly-asked-questions</id>
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Coronavirus commonly asked questions and answers&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Coronavirus commonly asked questions and answers&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		<category term="Employment Law" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Working Time Rest Breaks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/recent-employment-cases-in-the-news"/>
		<published>2019-05-22T08:48:09+01:00</published>
		<updated>2019-05-22T08:48:09+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.andertonlaw.co.uk/news/employment-law/recent-employment-cases-in-the-news</id>
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In the recent case of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gov.uk/employment-appeal-tribunal-decisions/mr-d-crawford-v-network-rail-infrastructure-ltd-ukeat-0316-16-ba&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;Network Rail Infrastructure v Crawford&lt;/a&gt;, it was decided by the Court of Appeal that a break does not need to be uninterrupted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;In the recent case of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gov.uk/employment-appeal-tribunal-decisions/mr-d-crawford-v-network-rail-infrastructure-ltd-ukeat-0316-16-ba&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;Network Rail Infrastructure v Crawford&lt;/a&gt;, it was decided by the Court of Appeal that a break does not need to be uninterrupted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		<category term="Employment Law" />
	</entry>
</feed>
